• Search for:
    4Nov, 2026
    Hiring my first employee: the true cost above salary

    The salary is the number you agree; it is nowhere near the number you pay. Hiring a first employee costs a studio far more than the headline figure, and the gap catches owners out.

    What sits on top of salary

    Employer National Insurance, the minimum pension contribution, holiday that has to be covered, and the software, desk and admin of having staff at all. As a rough rule, budget well above the salary before you have paid for a single laptop. A 30,000 pound salary is not a 30,000 pound decision.

    The costs that are easy to miss

    The non-cash ones. Your own time spent managing, the drop in your billable hours while you train someone, and the risk that the first hire is not the right one. Studios often hire when they are drowning and least able to train well, which is the worst possible moment to do it. Work out the true monthly cost, and the billable hours the hire has to cover, before you advertise, not after the first payroll run gives you a shock.

    The government sets out what employing someone involves, including the duties people forget until they apply.

    Written by Isla Fraser. General business information, not financial advice; figures current for 2026.…

    26Oct, 2026
    Our overheads, line by line, and what I cut this year

    Every January I print the overheads on one page and ask which lines still earn their place. This year the list was longer than I would like, so here it is, line by line, with what I kept and what I cut.

    The fixed lines

    Rent on the studio, which I nearly gave up for hot-desking and did not. Software, which had quietly bred into eleven subscriptions, three of which nobody could name. Professional indemnity and public liability insurance. The accountant, who costs a few hundred a quarter and saves more than that in work I would do badly. None of these moved much, except the software, where cutting three tools saved a surprising amount.

    The marketing line, and the one check I did

    Marketing is the line I am least sure of every year. Before renewing the search spend I checked our figure against a plain guide to how much SEO costs in the UK, decided ours was mid-range rather than daft, and kept it. That is the whole story on that line; the rest of the page is cashflow.

    What the page is really for

    Overheads are a cashflow problem more than a cost problem, because they leave the account on their own schedule whether or not a client has paid. I size them against a quiet month, not a good one. The same logic runs through how I price a project, and the staffing side sits in people and cashflow. If you cross the VAT threshold mid-year, redo the whole page, because every net figure on it just changed.

    Written by Isla Fraser. General business information, not financial advice; figures current for 2026.…

    20Oct, 2026
    Retainers that don’t erode: my contract clauses

    Most agency retainers start fair and quietly rot, because the work creeps up while the fee stays still. A few contract clauses stop that, and I wish someone had shown me them sooner.

    The clauses that hold the line

    Three earn their place. A scope boundary that names what is included and what is extra, so additions are a conversation rather than an assumption. An annual uplift tied to an index, so the fee keeps pace with costs without an awkward renegotiation. And a notice period that protects your cashflow when a client leaves, which they eventually do.

    The one most people skip

    A minimum term or kill fee. Without it, a client can take three months of ramp-up work and walk before you have recovered the setup cost. It feels pushy to ask for, and that reluctance is exactly why so many studios run the first months at a loss. Put it in writing at the start, when goodwill is highest, not after a bad exit.

    The government’s guidance for the self-employed covers the basics of contracting, but the clauses above come from scars, not statutes.

    Written by Isla Fraser. General business information, not financial advice; figures current for 2026.…

    15Sep, 2026
    How I price a project: the spreadsheet behind every quote
    A studio desk with a large monitor turned away, a sketchbook, a pencil and a cup, late afternoon light across the surface

    Three years ago I quoted £6,500 for a brand identity because the last one had been £6,000 and this one felt slightly bigger.

    We delivered it in a hundred and forty hours across eleven weeks. That was £46.43 an hour against a team that cost me more than that to employ before I paid rent. I did not know that at the time. I found out the following February when the accounts came back and the year had gone sideways for reasons I could not name.

    The spreadsheet in this piece is what I built afterwards. It has five tabs and it has never once produced a number that felt like the number I would have guessed.

    Tab 1: what an hour actually costs me

    This is the tab that changed how I quote.

    A designer on £45,000 does not cost £45,000. For 2026 to 2027 I pay employer National Insurance at 15% on everything above a £5,000 secondary threshold, and a minimum 3% pension contribution on qualifying earnings between £6,240 and £50,270.

    Line Amount
    Salary £45,000.00
    Employer National Insurance at 15% £6,000.00
    Employer pension at 3% £1,162.80
    Annual cost to the studio £52,162.80

    That is 15.9% on top of the salary, and I had been mentally pricing off the salary for four years.

    Then the hours. A year is 52 weeks, but statutory leave is 5.6 weeks including bank holidays, and if I am honest about sickness, training and the days that vanish it is closer to 44.8 working weeks. At 37.5 hours that is 1,680 paid hours a year, and not one studio on earth bills all of them.

    Utilisation Chargeable hours Cost per chargeable hour
    60% 1,008 £51.75
    70% 1,176 £44.36
    80% 1,344 £38.81
    Chart of the cost per chargeable hour of a 45,000 pound designer at 60, 70 and 80 percent utilisation, against the 46.43 pounds an hour realised on a mispriced brand project

    We run at about 65%. So my floor is roughly £47.75 an hour, for the person alone, before rent, software, my own time, or anything resembling profit.

    The £6,500 brand identity realised £46.43. I was underwater on the first tab of the spreadsheet and I had no idea.

    Tab 2: the hours, estimated by phase and then by person

    I stopped estimating projects and started estimating phases, because I am reliably wrong about projects and roughly right about phases.

    Every phase gets hours by person, not blended. A discovery week with me in it is not the same cost as a production week without me, and a blended rate hides exactly the thing I need to see: whether the project is profitable because of the production or in spite of the discovery.

    The rule I now apply without exception: whatever number I write down first, I add the revisions round I have not been told about yet. Not as padding. As a line item, visible, with hours against it, which means when the client asks to remove it we are having a real conversation instead of me absorbing it in silence.

    Tab 3: the things that are not hours

    Fonts. Stock. Illustration or photography I will commission. Print tests. The subscription I will renew for one month because this project needs it.

    These are small and they are the ones that quietly eat a margin, because every single one of them feels too minor to put in a quote and collectively they are four figures.

    Tab 4: the risk column

    One number, expressed as a percentage, applied to the hours total.

    • A returning client with a defined scope: 0%
    • A new client, clear scope: 10%
    • Anything with more than two approvers: 20%
    • Anything where the brief contains the phrase “we’ll know it when we see it”: 25%

    This is not a stealth price rise. It is an estimate of how much more of my team a project will consume, based on the only evidence I have, which is every previous project of that shape.

    The approver count is the strongest predictor I have found. Better than budget, better than sector, better than how organised the first meeting felt.

    Tab 5: the quote, and the two dates

    The output is a number, and two dates that matter more than the number.

    The payment terms. Where no date is agreed, the law says payment is late 30 days after the client receives the invoice or I deliver, whichever is later. I now agree a date explicitly, because “30 days from delivery” and “30 days from receipt of invoice” are different weeks and the difference is my payroll.

    The statutory interest line. I am entitled to 8% plus the Bank of England base rate on a late commercial invoice, without it being in the contract, because it is in the legislation. Bank Rate has been 3.75% since 30 July 2026 and is next reviewed on 17 September 2026, so today that is 11.75%.

    I put that line in every quote now, while I am not annoyed with anybody. It has never caused an argument and the average days-to-payment has come down.

    The mistake I still make

    I quote the scope I was asked for rather than the scope the project actually needs.

    A client asks for a brand identity. What they need is a brand identity and a fortnight of someone sitting with their sales team working out what they actually say. I know this by the second meeting. I put it in the quote maybe half the time, because the other half I am worried about the number getting too big and I tell myself we can deal with it later.

    We deal with it later. Unpaid, in week nine, with everybody tired.

    I have no clean solution to this. What I do now is price it as a separate optional phase with its own number, so that declining it is a decision the client makes rather than a corner I cut quietly.

    The trade-off I have accepted

    Costing to this level takes about ninety minutes per quote, and I lose some work because I am slower to respond than a studio that quotes off instinct in an afternoon.

    I have decided that is fine, and I want to be honest that it is a real cost rather than pretending the spreadsheet is free. The projects I lose to a faster quote are disproportionately the ones with the vague brief and the four approvers. I have lost some good ones too.

    What I would do

    Build tab 1 this week, before anything else. You do not need the other four to benefit. Take one person’s salary, add 15% employer National Insurance above the £5,000 threshold and 3% pension, divide by a realistic number of chargeable hours, and look at the figure.

    If your current rates are below it, you already know what the next conversation is.

    Then put the statutory interest line in your terms, and agree the payment date explicitly rather than letting the default 30 days decide it for you.

    And if you are anywhere near £90,000 of turnover in a rolling twelve months, the VAT registration threshold is going to arrive faster than you think and it changes every price on your rate card for clients who cannot reclaim it.

    Updated on 15 September 2026.

    Sources

    Vurrle Studio is one studio owner writing about her own pricing alongside published employer rates. It is not accounting or financial advice.…

    25Aug, 2026
    Personal Financial Design for Long-Term Financial Security

    Personal financial design provides a framework for organizing money around present needs and future ambitions. Instead of managing income and expenses without a clear direction, individuals can create a financial structure that connects everyday spending with larger objectives. Effective financial design can include budgeting, emergency savings, debt management, investment planning, and protection against unexpected financial challenges.

    The first step is understanding the current financial position. Reviewing income, recurring expenses, debts, savings, and existing investments provides a clearer picture of available resources. This information can then be used to establish realistic priorities. Some individuals may need to focus first on controlling expenses or reducing high-cost debt, while others may be ready to increase savings or explore long-term investment opportunities.

    Emergency savings are an important part of a resilient financial design. Unexpected expenses can disrupt even a carefully prepared budget. Maintaining accessible savings can reduce the need to rely on expensive borrowing when emergencies occur. At the same time, long-term savings and investments can be developed separately to support goals such as retirement, education, or major purchases.

    Building a Flexible Personal Financial Structure

    Risk management can strengthen the overall financial framework. Appropriate insurance, responsible borrowing, diversified investments, and regular financial reviews can help protect long-term plans from unexpected changes. Financial decisions should reflect personal circumstances, objectives, time horizons, and tolerance for risk rather than following a single strategy for everyone.

    Good financial design is ultimately an ongoing process. Income, expenses, responsibilities, and priorities can change throughout life, requiring regular adjustments to the financial plan. Reviewing progress periodically can help individuals identify opportunities, address weaknesses, and keep their financial strategy aligned with their goals. With consistent planning and informed decisions, personal financial design can support greater stability and long-term financial confidence.

     

    …

    25Aug, 2026
    Financial Design Principles for Sustainable Business Growth

    Financial design plays a central role in building businesses that can manage resources effectively and pursue sustainable growth. It involves organizing capital, cash flow, expenses, investments, and financial risks around clear business objectives. Rather than treating financial decisions as separate activities, companies can use financial design to create a connected framework for managing resources and supporting strategic priorities.

    Cash-flow planning is one of the most important components of business financial design. Companies need sufficient liquidity to cover payroll, suppliers, operating costs, taxes, and other obligations. Forecasting future cash inflows and outflows can help management identify potential shortages and prepare appropriate solutions. Strong cash-flow visibility also supports better decisions about hiring, purchasing, expansion, and investment.

    Capital allocation should be equally deliberate. Businesses may need to decide whether available funds should be directed toward equipment, technology, marketing, product development, staff, or expansion. Each investment should be assessed according to its expected benefits, costs, risks, and contribution to business objectives. This approach can help prevent resources from being committed to projects that provide limited strategic value.

    Creating a Flexible Financial Framework

    Financial risk should also be considered when designing business strategies. Excessive borrowing, weak reserves, unpredictable revenue, or dependence on a limited number of customers can create financial vulnerabilities. Businesses can strengthen resilience by maintaining appropriate reserves, reviewing financing arrangements, monitoring key financial indicators, and developing contingency plans.

    A successful financial design evolves alongside the organization. As revenue grows, markets change, and new opportunities emerge, financial structures may need to be adjusted. Regular financial reviews allow businesses to identify weaknesses, improve resource allocation, and respond more effectively to changing conditions. With disciplined planning and continuous evaluation, financial design can support stronger operations and sustainable long-term growth.

     

    …

    25Aug, 2026
    Financial Design Strategies for Better Money Management

    Financial design is the process of creating a structured approach to managing money, resources, and financial goals. It brings together budgeting, saving, investing, risk management, and long-term planning to create a practical financial framework. Whether applied to personal finances or business operations, thoughtful financial design can make financial decisions more organized and purposeful.

    A strong financial design begins with clear objectives. Individuals may focus on building savings, reducing debt, purchasing property, or preparing for retirement, while businesses may prioritize expansion, cash-flow stability, or investment. Defining these objectives helps determine how available financial resources should be allocated. Goals should also be reviewed regularly as income, expenses, and market conditions change.

    Budgeting provides the foundation for effective financial design. By organizing income and expenses, people and organizations can identify financial priorities and control unnecessary spending. A well-structured budget can also create room for emergency savings and future investments. Regular monitoring makes it easier to identify financial weaknesses before they become larger problems.

    Designing a More Resilient Financial Future

    Risk management is another essential element of financial design. Unexpected expenses, income changes, market fluctuations, and business disruptions can affect financial stability. Emergency reserves, appropriate insurance, diversified investments, and contingency planning can provide additional protection. The appropriate combination depends on individual circumstances, financial capacity, and specific objectives.

    Ultimately, effective financial design combines planning with flexibility. A financial strategy should not remain fixed when circumstances change. Regular reviews can help individuals and businesses adjust spending, savings, investments, and financial priorities. With a thoughtful structure and disciplined implementation, financial design can provide greater control over resources and create a stronger foundation for sustainable financial progress.

     

    …